A Different Take on the Wage Disparity

Many are quick to jump to the conclusion that the war on gender inequality is long over because of the variety of employment opportunities women are able to take advantage of these days. But, as Newsweek writer Jessica Bennett writes, “Just as the first black president hasn’t wiped out racism, a female at the top of a company doesn’t eradicate sexism” (“Are We There Yet?”). Statistics tell this story the best. Women are just 3% of Fortune 500 CEOs and less than a quarter of law partners and politicians (“Are We There Yet?”). Women comprise 7% of directors in the top 250 grossing films. Women hold only 3% of all clout positions in mainstream media (Newsom). Despite having earned higher college GPAs in all subjects, young women in all professions will take home 80% of what their male colleagues do. Finally, the four most common female positions of 2010 were secretary, registered nurse, teacher, and cashier. Replace nurse with “domestic help,” and we would be looking at the top female jobs from 1960 (“Are We There Yet?”). So if 56% of college undergraduates are women and we earn higher GPAs in all subjects, why aren’t there more women entering prestigious jobs? Faced with such overwhelming inequality, people are quick to blame it on the fact that many women are also mothers, which can indeed limit a woman’s potential in the workplace. But childless women, a decade out of college, who work full time, still make only 77 cents for every dollar a man makes (“Are We There Yet?”).

It very well may not be the job of mothering that keeps most women out of other jobs. According to Bennett’s article in Newsweek, recent studies have shown that young women avoid leadership positions for fear they will be labeled “bossy” and are four times less likely then men to negotiate a first salary because women who demand higher starting salaries are perceived as “less nice” and thus less likely to be hired. Women will actually hold themselves back in the workplace out of fear they will be dubbed “disagreeable” or “a bitch.” Some of us are holding ourselves back. We might hold our tongues and accept smaller salaries in order to stay in the good graces of the male population. We might prioritize men over one of the most fulfilling aspects of life: pursuing a career. As for those who do rise to positions of power, it is likely that many have wondered at least once if their success had anything to do with their looks and if their work is even valuable at all (“Are We There Yet?”).

Women are inferior to men in the workplace, whether it is because they do not make as much money for the same work, are not respected enough to get promoted, or suppress themselves out of fear of being unladylike. This last reason I think is the most disturbing—women deliberately keeping themselves down. It says quite a lot about American culture if today’s young women would rather remain in inferior positions than be called bitch. There is something in that word that must profoundly affect our sense of self-worth. How can we find it so devastating to be called bitch (i.e. unsuitable for men) but not to be seen as mentally inferior, or almost servant-like? We clearly have a long way to go when it comes to gaining gender equality if women feel like they need to avoid power in order to retain femininity. Unfortunately, this prevailing mentality is unlikely to be fixed by policy. The burden then is on us. What would you say to the young women in your life to encourage them to speak up in a professional setting?

Works Cited

Bennett, Jessica. “Are We There Yet?” Newsweek 18 Mar. 2010: n. pag. The Daily Beast. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. <http://www.thedailybeast.com/ >.

Newsom, Jennifer Siebel, dir. Miss Representation. Girls’ Club Entertainment, 2011. Film.

Advertisements
Categories: Isabel Geracioti | 2 Comments

Post navigation

2 thoughts on “A Different Take on the Wage Disparity

  1. mscherhorowitz

    I don’t necessarily think that not wanting to have a position of leadership means a woman is holding herself back. So much emphasis is placed on the idea that equality will be achieved once women hold the same positions that men do in the workforce, with little consideration as to whether that’s what they really want. Our society seems to have this strange idea that the ultimate sign of success is making it to the top of our respective fields, but it is very possible to achieve self-fulfillment without this. In the end, inequality in the workplace has to be eradicated by changing the system itself.

    • isabelgera

      Thanks for your comment! Sorry–Neither I (nor the HuffPost writer I think) were trying to imply that a woman is holding herself back by not wanting to be in a position of leadership. A woman holds herself back when she would ordinarily want to pursue this type of position, but deliberately chooses not to for fear of the social consequences.
      As to your questioning of whether or not women “really want” to hold the same positions as men, its true that we should not be basing gender equality on the number of prestigious positions held by each gender…But I have a hard time imagining that women are naturally not as ambitious as men, and a great number of us (perhaps as many women as men) probably do want to enjoy workplace authority.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: